Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
The Division 296 impost has prompted SMSF members looking at retaining assets in super to consider the tax impact of their death on their beneficiaries.
.
More SMSF members are looking at the effect of death benefit taxes on their beneficiaries as part of their consideration around whether to move assets out of superannuation to avoid the impact of the proposed Division 296 impost, according to administration provider Heffron.
Heffron managing director Meg Heffron said recent discussions with clients on the Division 296 tax had expanded to include issues such as where to move assets outside of super and estate planning.
“One of the most useful things about Division 296 tax being threatened, even if it’s never introduced, is it’s really focused the mind of a lot of people who have kept money in super because it’s a good tax deal and don’t want to take it out, and the government doesn’t make them take it out anymore,” Heffron said during a recent practitioner briefing.
“What they’re doing is running the gauntlet on death benefit taxes.
“A lot of the conversations I’ve been having with clients about this has been: ‘If I have this tax, which doesn’t necessarily make me worse off in super than outside super, and with that money over $3 million I don’t mind taking it out of super because at least I’m protecting my beneficiaries from that death benefit tax.’”
She said the issue of death benefit taxes arises because if a member moves assets out of superannuation, they are dealt with by the will, but where they are retained in super, they can have an impact on those receiving a death benefit from the fund.
“One of the things that has the biggest detrimental impact on wealth is dying with a whole heap of money in super and no spouse to leave it to,” she said.
“Usually, if there’s no spouse, it’ll end up with adult children or other beneficiaries that are not dependants and they pay very high rates of tax on most death benefits and that will end up dwarfing any Division 296 tax.
“I think in the end, we’ll end up having a very productive discussion about death benefit taxes prompted by something completely different, which is Division 296.”
June 26, 2025
Jason Spits
smsmagazine.com.au
More Articles
Most Reliable Car Brands in 2026
Check out which car brands are the most likely to stay on the road and not cost you a fortune to...
Super versus trusts: What is the best option with Div 296?
Super used to be clearly the “best” option due to low tax rates but the increasing complexity of things...
AI use needed with proper safeguards
The SMSF Association has suggested practitioners servicing the sector must equip themselves with more than...
Thinking of establishing an SMSF? Don’t skip reading the rules
As the establishment of new SMSFs continues to rise, the ATO is reminding potential trustees to ensure they...
Are downsizer contributions losing steam?
Tax Office data shows fewer people used its super scheme in 2024-25 . Introduced in 2018, the home...
Investment and economic outlook, February 2026
latest forecasts for investment returns and region-by-region economic outlook . Australia A rate...
Coercive control in SMSF becoming a hot issue
AFCA is anticipating there will be more focus on coercive control and elder abuse going...
What to look for when choosing a financial adviser
Here's how to find a financial adviser who can provide the right support for you . We believe...
Heathmont Financial Services Pty Ltd (ABN 68 106 250 104) trading as Heathmont Financial Services is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd (ABN 74 630 256 227), Australian Financial Services Licence Number (AFSL) 513763.
Julian McGoldrick is an Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd AFSL 513763.