ASIC consulting on changes to SMSF advice guidance

 

The corporate regulator is in the process of amending information sheet 205 and 206.

 

 

Speaking at a recent conference in Sydney last week, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ) superannuation and financial services leader Tony Negline said ASIC is currently in the process of amending and adjusting information sheet 205 and 206.

The two information sheets were released back in 2015 and specify the types of risks and costs that ASIC believes an adviser should consider and discuss with their clients when providing advice on SMSFs.

Some of the statements within information sheet 206 have been controversial within the SMSF industry, with ASIC suggesting that on average SMSFs with balances below $500,000 have lower returns after expenses and tax compared with funds regulated by APRA.

ASIC’s guidance on minimum SMSF balances was recently challenged by research report released earlier this year by the University of Adelaide.

The research data revealed there were no material differences in performance patterns for SMSFs between $200,000 and $500,000 compared with APRA-regulated funds.

The was also research undertaken by Rice Warner and the SMSF Association in 2020 which indicated that even SMSFs with balances between $100,000 and $150,000 could still be competitive with APRA-regulated funds, depending on what service providers they used.

ASIC told SMSF Adviser in March that it was in the process of reviewing the research on SMSF performance and minimum balances and would consider the implications of the research on its guidance.

Mr Negline said there is no set date yet for the release of the amended information sheets but the advice industry should be prepared for some new pieces of guidance in the “not-too-distant future”.

“We are working other industry associations including CPA Australia, the SMSF Association, and a number of others to provide feedback to ASIC about the draft of the changes they would like to make,” said Mr Negline.

 

 

24 October 2022
smsfadviser.com

 

More Articles

Most Reliable Car Brands in 2026

Check out which car brands are the most likely to stay on the road and not cost you a fortune to...

Read full article

Super versus trusts: What is the best option with Div 296?

Super used to be clearly the “best” option due to low tax rates but the increasing complexity of things...

Read full article

AI use needed with proper safeguards

The SMSF Association has suggested practitioners servicing the sector must equip themselves with more than...

Read full article

Thinking of establishing an SMSF? Don’t skip reading the rules

As the establishment of new SMSFs continues to rise, the ATO is reminding potential trustees to ensure they...

Read full article

Are downsizer contributions losing steam?

Tax Office data shows fewer people used its super scheme in 2024-25 . Introduced in 2018, the home...

Read full article

Investment and economic outlook, February 2026

latest forecasts for investment returns and region-by-region economic outlook . Australia A rate...

Read full article

Coercive control in SMSF becoming a hot issue

AFCA is anticipating there will be more focus on coercive control and elder abuse going...

Read full article

What to look for when choosing a financial adviser

Here's how to find a financial adviser who can provide the right support for you . We believe...

Read full article

Heathmont Financial Services Pty Ltd (ABN 68 106 250 104) trading as Heathmont Financial Services is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd (ABN 74 630 256 227), Australian Financial Services Licence Number (AFSL) 513763.

Julian McGoldrick is an Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd AFSL 513763.

Financial Services Guide - Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

^