New opportunities for employees to claim additional superannuation

Under the current rules, the maximum amount of “concessional” superannuation contributions that can be claimed is $25,000.00 per person per annum.

           

 

This is referred to as the “concessional contributions cap”. Concessional contributions refer to those contributions that are claimed as a tax deduction by the person or entity paying the contribution. They include employer contributions, salary sacrifice contributions and personal deductible contributions.

Up until 30 June 2017, the so-called “10 per cent rule” applied where you could only claim personal contributions if your income from employment was less than 10per cent of your total income. Note that the definition of “income” included “assessable fringe benefits” and “reportable superannuation contributions”.

This restriction meant that many employed individuals could not make deductible personal contributions to reduce their taxable incomes, and the only way to maximise their total concessional contributions cap was to make arrangements with their employer for a salary sacrifice arrangement where they would reduce their gross salary in favour of the employer making a larger contribution (above the normal 9.5 per cent of salary) to the employee’s super fund. These salary sacrifice arrangements are still available and continue to provide the same benefits, an employee may not always be able to make such arrangements with their particular employer.

Salary sacrifice arrangements can only be made prospectively, which means that if, say, the employee wanted to make a lump sum contribution near the end of the financial year, this would not be possible.

With the changes applying from 1 July 2017, employees can now make additional personal contributions and claim a tax deduction for the additional contributions, thus putting them on the same footing as self-employed people. The additional flexibility of this system may be helpful in several different scenarios. Take the following for example:

  • Mary is working as a specialist teacher earning, say, $110,000.
  • She has had an investment property in a capital city for many years and decides to sell the property to rearrange her investments in preparation for planned retirement in a few years.
  • She is shocked to find out from her accountant that based on the estimated sale price, there will be a taxable capital gain of $100,000 on the sale of the property which will cost her almost $45,000 in additional tax.
  • Mary is able to make an additional contribution to superannuation of $14,500 and, as a result, reduces her tax bill by around $7,000.
  • Although Mary’s super fund will have to pay tax of $2,175 on the additional contribution, she is still almost $5,000 better off.

Or take the case of Joe who is employed as a builder and earns $60,000 p.a. In May, Joe receives a bequest of $25,000 from the estate of a recently deceased relative. He would like to retain around $6,000 of the money to take the family on a holiday trip and save the balance of $19,000.

After talking to his financial adviser, Joe decides to contribute the full $25,000 to his existing superannuation fund; $19,000 is claimed as a concessional contribution and $6,000 as a non-concessional contribution. As a result of claiming the additional contribution, Joe receives an additional tax refund of $6,800, which he uses for the family holiday.

After allowing for the additional tax in the super fund on the concessional contribution of $2,850 (i.e. 15 per cent of $19,000), Joe has increased his net savings by $3,150 and also has an additional $800 spending money for the holiday!

Note that people who are 65 or older are still required to meet the “work test” in order to claim concessional contributions, although this is not normally an issue for people with a significant part of their income coming from wages.

Note also that just like salary sacrifice superannuation contributions, Centrelink adds back any personal concessional contributions claimed when assessing entitlements that are subject to the “income test”.

 

Bob Locke
25 November 2019
smsfadviser.com

 

More Articles

From Bricks to iPhones: The Evolution of the Telephone

Check out the history of communication, eventually leading to the modern phones we use...

Read full article

SMSF commercial property owners and Div 296 ‘misconceptions’

There are three misconceptions among business owners with SMSF commercial property, a finance expert...

Read full article

LRBA stability has been understated

The stability of limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBA) within SMSFs has been understated, with their...

Read full article

7 simple steps to get on the investment ladder

Entering the world of investing can be a life-changer for people of all ages. Here are seven simple steps for...

Read full article

Carer responsibilities don’t meet interdependency criteria: PBR

A parent who was the sole carer for a terminally ill child is not considered to be in an interdependency...

Read full article

Can I access my super early?

Many older Australians are understandably eager to access their superannuation, but strict rules...

Read full article

Look for the red flags that signal unscrupulous advice

While the ATO is watching for signs of illegal early access to superannuation, SMSF trustees should also be on...

Read full article

Magnificent Seven: More diverse than they may appear

The Magnificent Seven are more diverse businesses than their shared label suggests . The...

Read full article

Heathmont Financial Services Pty Ltd (ABN 68 106 250 104) trading as Heathmont Financial Services is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd (ABN 74 630 256 227), Australian Financial Services Licence Number (AFSL) 513763.

Julian McGoldrick is an Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd AFSL 513763.

Financial Services Guide - Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

^