Partial property sales eligible for downsizer

Superannuation fund members making a downsizer contribution do not have to sell the whole property or even move out of it after the sale, but cannot claim a contribution for land that has undergone a subdivision, a technical expert has advised.

 

Colonial First State head of technical services Craig Day said the key issue with making a downsizer contribution was whether the person making the contribution sold their ownership interest, or a part of it, in the property.

Day made the comments at the recent Tax Institute National Superannuation Conference in Sydney in response to a question as to whether a part of a house wholly owned by one spouse can be sold to their partner, with the proceeds of that transaction being used to make a downsizer contribution for one or both partners.

“If they are disposing of a house or their ownership interest in a house, they may qualify for downsizer,” he said.

“Even though they are still going to live in it because they are selling part of their ownership interest in the house, they may also qualify for downsizing.

“In that situation, how much is the property worth? Is it worth more than $300,000 or $600,000? If so, potentially the spouse can do [a downsizer contribution] as well.

“You have to work your way through the downsizer rules because a lot of people get thrown off by the spouse situation, but the rules apply to both the property owner as well as their spouse, so the spouse gets it as well.”

He added selling part of a residential property for downsizer purposes did not apply in most cases to plans to subdivide property and sell that to make a downsizer contribution.

“We get lots of questions about subdividing property for downsizer purposes and it depends,” he said.

“Lots of people want to subdivide the backyard and sell that part off thinking they can get the downsizer.

“Unfortunately, when you subdivide that property, the newer section never had a dwelling on it, so it is not eligible under the downsizer rules, which state it has to have a dwelling.”

 

 

 

Jason Spits
September 21, 2022
smsmagazine.com.au

More Articles

Tokenisation to change SMSF landscape

The tokenisation with regard to the ownership structure of conventional assets will have a profound impact on...

Read full article

Super viewed as mortgage solution

A high number of people plan to use super to extinguish their mortgage as more people expect to retire still...

Read full article

How to turn your annual SMSF investment strategy review into a genuine analytical exercise

Many SMSF trustees see the annual investment strategy review as a compliance obligation.   Many SMS...

Read full article

SMSF pension shortfall – when can trustees self-assess?

Few SMSF compliance issues create as much anxiety as discovering a minimum pension hasn’t been...

Read full article

CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair

The Institute of Public Accountants has criticised the government’s intention to impose a levy on SMS...

Read full article

Financial literacy in Australia: Where we’re improving (and falling behind)

How well do we understand our money?   How well do we understand our money? Most of us make...

Read full article

Five steps towards a more confident retirement

Small steps today could make a big difference to how you feel about retirement.   Small steps today...

Read full article

Check out the largest castles by country

Check out the largest fortresses by country. Only existing fortresses that stand today are...

Read full article

Heathmont Financial Services Pty Ltd (ABN 68 106 250 104) trading as Heathmont Financial Services is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd (ABN 74 630 256 227), Australian Financial Services Licence Number (AFSL) 513763.

Julian McGoldrick is an Authorised Representative (No. 262098) of Knox Wealth Management Pty Ltd AFSL 513763.

Financial Services Guide - Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

^